Rabbi Mark Asher Goodman
  • Home
  • About
  • Writings
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Media Coverage
  • Soccer Rabbi

Toldot 5785 - Journeys, Treasures, Thanksgiving

12/1/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture


There is a story in Elie Wiesel’s book ‘Souls on Fire’ attributed both to Rebbe Nachman and to Simcha Bunim of Pshisecha, but since I’m a fan of Simcha Bunim, we’re gonna go with the story belonging to him.

There once was a man in Krakow, Itzik son of Yekel, a poor Jew, with a wife and kids. Every day he would pray that God would ease his families suffering and make him not so poor. He would go to shul morning and evening and pray, and he would pray in between just as hard. It went on this way for months, and then years.

And then one night he had a dream. In the dream, he was in a far away place. A voice told him: this is Prague. This is the Vltava River. Here is the castle. And here is the stone bridge over the river. Dig under this bridge, and there is a treasure. It is yours. Your problems are resolved. He awoke from his dream, and he did the same thing we all do when we awake from a dream. He said ‘what a silly dream.’ And he went about his day, praying, and worrying, and scratching to get by for him and his family. And that night, he had the dream again. This time the voice added ‘would you rather be rich? Or would you rather be worried?’
Itzik again ignored the dream, because it would be sheer madness to travel from Krakow to Prague, a 400 mile trip, because a dream told him to. Moreover, Itzik had no money, and what little he had he would need to leave with his wife and kids so that they could get by while he was gone. Nope, he would not go. But the dream persisted, night after night, taunting him. The voice would say ‘what? You haven’t left yet?’ What is stopping you?’ Finally, he made up his mind. He would go, if only to get the dream out of his head.
Itzik set off on foot with not a penny in his pocket and only the clothes on his back. He walked for days, eating what he could forage or begging for bread, sleeping by the road side. Finally, after two weeks, he arrived, filthy, exhausted and starving, in Prague. He went to the town center near the castle, and there he saw the great stone bridge. He saw the exact spot from his dream where the voice told him to dig, and even though he felt silly doing it, he began to dig. But no sooner did he put his head down for a minute to put his effort into digging, but a soldier, the captain of the watch, saw him from the bridge, and came down to detain him. This captain accused Itzik of spying and began to batter him with questions. Who are you? Why are you here? Why are you digging under the kings bridge? So of course, Itzik told his story, about being poor, and the praying, and the dream, and the voice, and the bridge, and the journey, and the treasure.

And when he came to the end, the captain began laughing and laughing. He said ‘See here, you dumb Jew. You came all this way because a dream told you? How ridiculous! It just so happens that I too have been having a dream. In the dream, a voice tells me to go to Krakow. Every night the voice tells me and shows me the house of Itzik, son of Yekel. And it tells me to go there, and dig under the stove, and there I will find a treasure. Can you imagine such a thing? Why would I travel to Krakow for a non-existent treasure? And even if I did, I’m sure half the city is made up of Jews named Itzik and the other half made of Jews named Yekel.’ The captain laughed some more, and then released Itzik, who hurried on his way. 

Itzik returned home, walking twice as fast as he had on the first leg of his journey. He arrived home, moved the stove, and there underneath was the treasure. He paid his debts and could provide for his wife and his children, for their schooling and that they could eat lavishly for the rest of their lives. He dedicated the rest to build a synagogue in his name, and he lived out the rest of his days a pious man, even though he no longer needed to pray that God take away his poverty.
…
A quick disclaimer before I can continue: the point of this story is not for all of you to dig underneath your stove at home. Seeing as this is Pittsburgh, odds are the only thing under your stove is your basement, and the only notable feature in your basement is likely a toilet that sits in the middle of the room with no walls or bathroom around it.

Our story I think has several meanings, and I think it is important to resist any one of them as the real meaning, because if that were so, the story would be too simple. The first meaning, of course, is the mashal, the moral, and that is that we often go searching far and wide for a thing that exists right back at home. This is a hassidic parable version of the concept ‘the grass is always greener’ - that we constantly think there is something better out there when what we need was right here all along. 
The second lesson in the story, though, is about the value of the journey. Itzik would never have found the treasure at home unless he had gone on the perilous journey to Prague – and at the end of the journey, we find another man who refuses to take the journey; who refuses to take the risk and therefore he receives no reward. So of course, the journey is essential, even though it is possible by the conclusion of the story that it might have ultimately been unnecessary, since the treasure was under the stove all along.
The third lesson, though, is in the piety, and the suffering, and in the belief in the voice. This part of the story I might not have fully recognized were it not for the fact that there is a feature length film with essentially the same message - Kevin Costner’s Field of Dreams - which is a great movie that you should all watch even though it isn’t baseball season right now. The movie has, oddly, all the elements of the Simcha Bunim story - a disembodied voice that whispers a crazy idea, ‘if you build it , he will come’  a long journey to retrieve first a famous writer, played by James Earl Jones, and then an old former minor leaguer, played by Burt Lancaster. In Field of Dreams though, the financial struggle and the doubt and the pathos of the movie is what makes the payoff at the end so rewarding.
All of this reminded me somewhat of this weeks Torah portion, in a weird way. Parshat Toldot is the origin story of Yakov and Esav, twin boys that battled from the moment of conception in their mothers belly. They emerge from the womb as polar opposites - Yakov a man of the tent, and Esav a man of the field, a hunter. Yakov then lies and cheats his brother Esav out of his birthright, and his blessing. This cheating becomes a leitmotif - a recurring theme, in Yakov’s life, as his father in law Laban will cheat him in work and in marriage and his sons will cheat him out of Joseph.

This weeks parsha has the beginning of the journey for both of our characters, Yakov and Esav, and they originate from this funny dramatic moment of the cheating of the patriarchal blessing. When we join the third triennial reading for this week, we see Yakov getting his blessing from his father, who thinks he is Esav, the elder. And then he leaves, and Esav comes in with a prepared dish for the old man. And Esav says “Bless me too, Father!” And Yitzhak the father replies, “Your brother came with guile and took away your blessing.” But Esav pleads, and Yitzhak provides another blessing:
“See, your abode shall enjoy the fat of the earth
And the dew of heaven above.
Yet by your sword you shall live,
And you shall serve your brother;
But when you grow restive,
You shall break his yoke from your neck.”
Esav is still incensed - he plans to kill Yaakov. Rivkah tells Yakov to run, he runs, and his life now has kind of a motivating backstory of both deception and the need to go on the run. And Esav also departs, and he also has a motivating backstory of being deceived and wanting to kill.

OK but here’s the thing. When we rejoin the brothers two torah portions from now, in Parshat Vayishlach, both Yakov and Esav are prosperous and successful. Esav has an entourage of 400 men and women.Yaakov is wealthy enough that he can send him 200 she-goats and 20 he-goats; 200 ewes and 20 rams; 30 milch camels with their colts; 40 cows and 10 bulls; 20 female-donkeys and 10 male-donkeys. The elder does not really serve the younger. Both turn out fine. And of course, the first thing they do when they see each other is make up.

And also - both brothers are forced at the end of the parsha to leave home. This is, famously, an essential plot element in all of the most successful movies - that the young main character is forced to fend for themselves, without parental protection, and that they must go out into the world. It is why Luke Skywalker and Princess Leia are both orphaned at the beginning of Star Wars, and why Disney movies almost always start with our hero or heroine becoming an orphan.

In other words, the big motivating concept we talk about in this weeks Torah portion, the stealing of blessing, is kind of irrelevant, since both brothers seem to do fine regardless of the blessing. It’s actually, in the broader sweep of the Torah’s narrative, a macguffin - a plot device employed by the story in order to get our two characters out in order to see the world and go on a journey.

For those of you not familiar with a macguffin, its a term in film that originated with Alfred Hitchcock. It is a physical object that the characters need to find or retrieve that drives the plot and the characters forward. But of course, we the audience are more interested in the characters and the plot than we are with the object. Famous macguffins in movies include the maltese falcon in the movie the maltese falcon, and r2-d2 in the first star wars movie, since he has the plans for how to blow up the death star, and of course my favorite movie macguffin, Marcellus Wallace’s briefcase in Quentin Tarantino’s Pulp Fiction - which is the perfect movie macguffin because we actually never find out what’s in it, making it extra double irrelevant except as a plot device.

In the story of poor pious Itzik, the treasure is a macguffin. In the story of Yakov and Esav, the blessing and the birthright are macguffins. The real value is in the journey. But to simplify and summarize all this into ‘it’s not the destination that matters but rather the journey’ is to reduce torah into a fortune cookie - a pithy cute bit of wisdom. I mean, you could sum up this dvar torah at the shabbos table later for your guests by saying ‘the rabbi talked about the importance of the destination and not the journey’ and you wouldn’t be wrong, but you’d also miss some of the point.

This is, of course, the week of journeys in America. Every year at this time, except of course during the pandemic, the newspapers do a story saying ‘this is expected to be the busiest travel weekend ever’, because of course it is, there are more Americans this year than last year, and more of them take to the roads and rails and skies to visit their family. And some years the travel is easy, and some years it is hard. And some years we are the ones that hit the road, and some years the family comes to us. And some years there are reasons why we cannot be together - someone is sick or too old to travel, or someone has to work, or the family is divided by some disagreement, and maybe next year is the year we can all be together. Even when we are together, we sometimes go through a personal journey at thanksgiving of reestablishing who we are at the dinner table in familial pecking order or in the eyes of our parents or our children.  In this respect, our journeys are not actual journeys, but personal journeys about longing or absence or loneliness that must be overcome. The turkey is a macguffin too, and we travel to it, or maybe we spend the day in the kitchen roasting it, as part of a heroes journey that we all take through life.

In our personal journeys, we all take the heroes journey at thanksgiving into learning about ourselves and overcoming difficulties. Maybe our journeys are like Yakov and Esavs journey - beginning with our own flaws and errors and requiring us to learn and grow from them. Maybe they are like Itzik son of Yekels - a journey to discover that what is valuable was at home all along.

Maybe the journey was the important thing. Maybe the valuable thing was following the dream in the first place, or fulfilling your dream and remaining essentially the same person afterwards. Maybe the treasure was behind the stove all along. Shabbat Shalom.


0 Comments

Vayera: Complancency is not an option

11/16/2024

0 Comments

 
Dvar Torah Vayera 5785

And God spoke, saying shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do?

And God said, “I will bring fire and brimstone from on high unto the plain of sodom and gomorrah for their sin is so great.”

And Abraham said, “Ok. Fine by me.”

And God said “Wait. Really? this doesn’t bother you?”

And Abraham said “Well, it’s really not my problem. I don’t know those guys and I’m really not involved. Besides, my tent is up here and so it really won’t affect me.”

And God said “Well I mean, I guess? But aren’t you concerned at all? 
Concerned with the pain and suffering of others? 

Or the moral implications of a God that delivers collective punishment onto an entire society? Or at least worried about the precedent set by a god that gets irritated by the failings and immoralities of humankind, and then just torches everything?”

And Abraham said, “I mean, I don’t see why it’s my problem. I have my own stuff to deal with.”

And God was silent. Fire began to fall from the heavens and the dull sound of screams could be heard in the distance. 

And Abraham returned to his tent , and went inside, and closed the flap.

…

You are all familiar with the story of Abraham and God at Sodom and Gomorrah - and all of you are probably aware that my dramatic alternative retelling is not how it ultimately goes down. And it’s pretty clear why it doesn’t go down that way. For Abraham to talk back to God at a moment when God is poised to deliver righteous divine judgment on a pair of towns that have been judged to be wholly wicked is a defining characteristic of who Abraham is, and how we understand a central moral principle of Judaism, and that is: standing up and speaking out is a feature of our tradition, not a bug.

Moreover, the story of Abraham and Sodom and Gomorrah in my fanciful retelling is both shocking and not shocking. It’s shocking, because we’re so conditioned to Abraham standing up to God, to Moses standing up to God, and to our matriarchs and Patriarchs having exceptional relationships with God, that for Abraham to shrug and say ‘it’s not my problem’ unravels our whole notion of Abraham. And second, if God were to present a character in the bible with a moral choice only for them to respond ‘hey man, this really isn’t my problem’ is really a dog-bites-man story, and by that I mean, it’s not a compelling story. There’s a reason the local news likes to do feel-good stories of the man that won the lottery and paid off the lunch debt of the local elementary school, or the woman that went down a well to save the neighbors cat. Because that person had every reason to say ‘that’s really not my problem’, but they didn’t. Abraham’s act is even a little beyond that: God, the judge of all the earth, the arbiter of good and evil, says hey, heads up, I’m gonna wipe out some towns because they’re evil.’ And Abraham’s response is to question the judge and creator of everything. 

But also, it’s not shocking, because sometimes good people do nothing. Sometimes, evil triumphs over good. Sometimes, we get a feel good story of an upstander in awful times, like in the movie Schindler’s List or Hotel Rwanda – a person who, at great personal risk, sticks his neck out for someone else. But those feel good movies exist because there are many, many human instances where people do not look out for one another.

By the way, Jewish tradition does have a guy who says ‘it’s really not my problem.’ His name was Jonah. When God tells him the morally right thing to do, he literally runs, or more accurately he takes a boat, the other way. There is a reason there are many synagogues throughout the world called ‘Benei Avraham’, but no synagogues called ‘Benei Yonah.’

There is never a time when asking questions about what is right and good and moral is out of place. It is always notable to stop and consider when we as individuals call something out that we see as immoral and unjust. But there is especially no time like the present and the immediate future. Because I think there are two forms of resignation that we might otherwise fall victim to. The first is that we might be willing to convince ourselves that something unjust or immoral really isn’t that big a deal - and so we will simply say ‘well, I don’t see the problem.’ This is akin to Abraham saying ‘well, I’m sure that destroying Sodom and Gomorrah is a reasonable thing to do’, even though in his stomach, he feels queasy about it. The second is for a person to conclude that it really isn’t their problem. It’s not my fight, Abraham could conclude regarding Sodom. Maybe one of God’s other prophets can stand up and call out the potential injustice of the situation.
This second issue touches on a complex problem for each of us, and one that pollsters attempted to analyze before and after the election in depth - and that is voters making choices in either their best interests or the best interests of those around them.

Abraham does not live in Sodom and Gomorrah, but his nephew Lot does. So perhaps he feels like he should involve himself in the affairs of the town by blood. But I’ve always understood Abraham to be an international man of justice. He’s not upset because God might kill a family member; he’s upset because God, his God, the God of justice, seems to be doing something unjust to non-Jews, which at this point in history, is simply everyone on earth other than Abraham and Sarah. Abraham does not concern himself with the national origin or otherness of the victims; he simply sees something that is wrong and he stands up to say ‘this is wrong.’ 

A classic interpretation of this week’s parsha understands that although Noach was called tzaddik be’dorotav – righteous in his generation – Avraham was in contrast simply a tzaddik - righteous in the absolute. Additionally, it is noted by the rabbis that while Noach is said to have walked with God, Abraham is said to have walked before God. The many commentators are interested in the distinction of why Noach is only so-so, but Abraham is elite in his righteousness. But there are some interesting alternative takes.

One fascinating take on this is from a rabbinic midrash in tanchuma, dated to around the 8th century CE. The text teaches us “Noach walked with God” - that the Holy One Blessed Be believed that Noach would not sink down to doing the deeds of the generation of the flood. This can be compared (mashal) to a king who had a child, and he would walk in the role of messenger for his father, and he would go before him on a path with deep mud, and the king relied upon him to not be swallowed up by mud. (Tanchuma 5) 

So the standard take, for instance the one that Rashi takes, is that Noach was only sorta good. By comparison to a lousy miserable immoral generation of individuals, Noach was a neutral human, but in comparison to others, that makes him a tzaddik. However, this reading by the Tanchuma flips that idea on its head. In a generation where everyone is an unredeemable horrible wicked jerk, it would have been even harder for Noach to be ok. But God saw Noach and said ‘here is a man that, if he can walk through the mud, I can follow him.’ And so the king let him walk, and he walked.

Abraham is described not as walking with God, but before God. God said ‘here is what I’m going to do.’ And Abraham said ‘Yeah, no, don’t do that, that’s wrong.’ In this moment, we can understand that perhaps God, in the post Cain and Abel, post-Noach and the flood evolution, is still figuring out how to manage humanity. The moral absolutes of the 10 commandments and the 613 mitzvot are still well off in the distance. God has seen small scale evil and widespread evil and God is tinkering with notions of justice. And Abraham responds with protest.

Of this the 19th and 20th century mussar rabbi, Rabbi Nosson Tzvi Finkel, taught this:
Behold, before us, after all of the wondrous and grand and powerful deeds that we saw in Noach, in his walking the path of the Holy One Blessed Be to do hesed for all the world together, to feed them and to provide for them and care for them, etc. And on account of this, it was said of him with great praise “Noach walked with God.” In any event, there is a higher level than this further that one can claim, because Noach only walked with God, and not before God. Thus his strength was bad, that he needed help. For there are upper reaches of spirituality, which has no end or limit. And a person, it is in their nature to go higher and higher constantly, without any stopping.

In other words, to Rabbi Nosson Tzvi, Noach was a great and holy man, a baal hesed, who tried to get other people to stop sinning, and was a provider and caregiver to both humans and animals. And that he was a good person even when the influences around him were bad. And yet Abraham was an even better human, because while Noach needed God alongside him to make it through, Abraham walked in front of God, with no need for support. But then Nosson Tzvi goes even further to say 
. כי למעלות הרוחניות אין קץ וסוף ;והאדם נתבע לעלות ולעלות תמיד בלא הפסק כלל.
‘For there are upper reaches of spirituality, which has no end or limit. And a person, it is in their nature to go higher and higher constantly, without any stopping.’


Which is a totally radical thing for any rabbi to say. It’s not that Noach was so-so, and Abraham was great, so be like Abraham. It’s that Noach was great, and Abraham was even better … And you can be better than Abraham. It might be presumptuous, but I will add my understanding here: Abraham had that one moment to stand up for justice, and he’s a tzaddik. But perhaps there were other moments that he did not seize upon, but that others might have. You can be like Abraham. But you can also, potentially, be better than Abraham. There is no absolute tzaddik. There is only higher and higher.





And in this context, the standing up is important, and the fearlessness is important. Just the other day, you may have come across the same news item that I did - a video of an incident that took place in the New Zealand house of commons. A right wing party in the parliament was attempting to pass a bill that would undo a treaty from 1840 called the Te Tiriti o Waitangi - which was the basis for a certain degree of indigenous Maori rights to both land and leadership. Rising in opposition to the proposal on the parliament floor, Representative Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke begins to speak. But after a few words, she tears up a piece of paper, and (SING)  she begins singing, and then breaks into a shout ‘ah Ka mate, ka mate! Ka ora, ka ora!’ - at which point several other Maori politicians stand and take the floor and begin to do a haka, which is something of a Maori war dance that many of you rugby and soccer fans will be familiar with. And the gallery begins to sing and chant the words to the haka with them. In the midst of this the speaker of the parliament looks utterly pained and says aloud ‘oh don’t do that’ before being completely drowned out. 

That moment - when house speaker Gerry Brownlee, a decidedly pale and not Maori individual, reacts with horror to the official way of proceeding in business by saying ‘oh don’t do that’ - is a fascinating one for me. He knew what was coming - that the normal order and decorum of the chamber was about to go all to hell - and he couldn’t stop it. That the moment went viral on social media and that people around the world now know about the attempt to undo the Te Tiriti o Waitangi is a testament to the power of standing up. Protest is powerful, even when its result is hard to immediately measure. In fact, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah is told to us in Genesis 18 even though, ultimately, Abraham did not save the town. The message then is that sometimes an examination of what is just and unjust will conclude unsatisfactorily. That does not mean you do not examine future moments which might be a miscarriage of justice. 

A few years ago, there were many such protests. There was the women’s march, and protests against the so-called Muslim ban, and marches regarding police brutality around George Floyd and Brianna Taylor and Antwon Rose, and marches against forced separation of families who crossed the US-Mexico border and were applying for asylum. And there have been vigils for gun violence, and marches and demonstrations in Israel regarding the role of the courts and maintaining democracy, not to mention marches to bring home the hostages. And in many of these cases, one might argue that protest was ineffective. Roe v Wade was overturned. AR-15s are still widely available. The Muslim ban and a host of other anti-immigrant legislation is almost certainly going to be reinstated. However, it would also be accurate to conclude that we have yet to see the impact of something like the women's march because we never know how the long arc of history will react to protest movements. Changing the morality and the sentiment of an entire nation is slow business, and we live in impatient times. 

But additionally, we will never know how much worse it could have been without all the advocacy and protest. After Roe v Wade was overturned in June 2022, states began the process of sorting out their own positions on abortion. You probably didn’t read about it in the news, because there were some other notable things that occurred on Tuesday November 5th. But Abortion was on the ballot in 10 states. And in 7 of those states, the right to an abortion was enshrined by voters in their state constitutions - states that did not have constitutional abortion protections before. So even though you can’t draw a straight line from the Women’s march to, say, the state of Arizona’s decision to guarantee a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, I would argue that nothing exists in a vacuum. 

Mass movements define the morals and trends of a society. The protests against the Vietnam war didn’t end the war immediately, but they certainly demonstrated to the powers that be and to the American people which way much of the country felt about it, and moments like that carry forward in the collective memory for generations. The things we say and do today, the reactions or non-reactions we undertake over the next four years, will have a defining impact on what America values and believes, and specifically what Jewish Americans value and believe. So we can’t simply stay quiet and say ‘ok, fine by me’ when we see something that is unjust, because it’s simply not who we are. There will be a hundred little moments and reminders of that going forward, and we will each individually and collectively have to pick our battles. 

But pick them. Walk before God. Do not sink into the mud of a collective morality that is not our own and is not just or Godly or derived from Torah. And do not be dismayed by the uncertainty of the effect. Abraham did not return to his tent, go inside, and close the flap. And neither should we.


0 Comments

Yizkor Yom Kippur 5785 - Only In Dreams

10/13/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
Yizkor 5785

The question we all ask about death, of course, is ‘where do we go?’ And of course the answer is ‘nobody knows’. Of course, our tradition gives a variety of answers. Avraham is discussed as ‘going down to Sheol’. Isaiah talks of an end of days where God returns and those that have passed return to an eternal life. The rabbis of the talmud believe in an olam haba, a world to come, in which the righteous live lives of ease and torah study. The kabbalists believe in gilgul hanefesh, the reincarnation of souls, in which the total number of souls at sinai of 600,000 are fractionalized and constantly recycled for all eternity. 
A few years ago I told the story of the test of the caterpillars and the butterfly - that researchers flashed a light and then sprayed a nasty smell at caterpillars, and then after they went into a chrysalis and turned to goo and recombobulated and were reformed into butterflies, they flashed the light and the non-control group ran away, because they were afraid of the spray, but the control group did nothing. The test indicated that even though caterpillars go through an incredible transformation in which nothing of the orginal creature except the base cells remain, and yet they persist beyond the chrysalis.  But, at the end of the day, we don’t really know what happens after we die.

There’s one other hint in the Talmud about what it maybe is. The Talmud tells us ‘sleep is 1/60th of death.’ It does not elaborate. But sleep - and dreams - are a fascinating way to imagine the world beyond.

When we sleep, elements of our waking life pop up in haphazard fashion. Long dead friends are there, at an age we recognize them. We dream dreams of calm but also anxiety - many of us still wake up worried about the test we showed up for unprepared in 8th grade, only upon waking to remember that we graduated high school, and college, and graduate school. Our dreams are out of time and beyond reason, but when we are in them, that doesn’t bother us. We are in communication with the present, the past, and the future, all at once. The dream world is its own world with its own rules, and we don’t really understand them. And when we dream we are totally unaware that any other world exists.

And then there is the waking world, which we consider a more primary world. The waking world is linear and interactive, but also busy and demanding in ways the dream world is not. There are wonderful and terrible things about the physical waking world. We sometimes retain things that happened in the dream world, but they remain hazy, foggy. Sometimes we tell them to our spouse or our therapist, or maybe we keep a dream journal by the bed - which can be really fun. And most of us we think of the waking world as real, and the sleeping world as imagined. But when we are in those worlds, we don’t really feel that way. We’re in the now, and it is real, and there is no other world.

What if the world beyond was like that? What if it is all too real when we are in it, and perhaps the notion of another world is a drifting idea, or a faint echo? Our loved ones are there - safe, comfortable, unaware of us. Maybe that’s because the soul persists beyond death. Maybe it’s more organic than that - all our cells began in the big bang as stardust, and all our atoms rejoin the universe after we pass. Maybe its more metaphysical than that - that there are other dimensions and states of being - a true olam haba. That world might be shades of this one, as the waking world is to the sleeping world. Maybe, true to some of my favorite movies like Inception and The Matrix, this world is actually the dream world, and we only discover that in the next one. And all the loved ones we ever encounter in this world, rather than being a faint memory in the next world, are actually a faint memory in this one, and a stronger reality in the next. Imagine that in a dream your mothers love is warm but hazy, and in this world it is very real, and the next world it becomes 1000x stronger. Maybe.

We miss our loved ones. We call to them through the dream world on this day, at yizkor, whispering ‘ we love you and we miss you and we wish you were here.’ But like a dream, we remember them, and they come alive in our memories and in our dreams.

0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Divrei Torah

    A 'Dvar Torah'; literally a 'word of Torah', is an explanation of a verse or a concept from the Torah. Enjoy Rabbi Goodman's takes on the weekly Torah portion, the holidays, or a matter of Jewish ethics here.

    All work is copyrighted, but may be used with citation or attribution.

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

    Archives

    April 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    August 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    March 2021
    September 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    April 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    April 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly